PhD Studentship: “Urban Agora and the Search for Authenticity – London’s Street Markets as Alternative Retail Experiences” #KingsBusinessSchool #Marketing #Sociology #Studentship #PhD

Uncategorized

https://www.findaphd.com/phds/project/urban-agora-and-the-search-for-authenticity-london-s-street-markets-as-alternative-retail-experiences/?p182137

About the Project

This PhD project aims to explore how market participants produce “authenticity” and use it to generate value (Zukin, 2011). Specifically, it investigates how marketing practices undertaken by market operators and traders in a street market facilitate the emergence of “authentic spaces”, the generation of value, and wider economic and social benefits for the community. Market participants engage in marketing practices to attract and retain customers (Dibb et al., 2014). They encompass transactional activities such as offering curation and relational activities such as interaction with customers and amongst traders. This project is anchored in the UK non-store retailing industry. While retailing is dominated by online sales (ONS, 2021), brick-and-mortar retail forms such as street markets still exist, adding up to roughly 1000+ locations nationwide (NABMA, 2022). They allow for economic and social interaction among local communities and visitors. Given their flux and heightened competition for pitches in crowded urban spaces, innovative marketing practices are indispensable for street traders and operators (Binkley and Connor, 1998; GLA, 2019; RBKC, 2022; vom Lehn, 2014). 

London houses around 280 street markets. They employ roughly 13,250 people and contribute £247.6 million to the capital’s economy (GLA, 2019). The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) – the project’s non-academic partner – houses eight markets (RBKC, 2022). The RBKC street trading office manages two of them, including the world-famous Portobello Market, and exerts statutory controls over the other sites. These markets supply local communities and tourists with goods ranging from antiques, fruit and vegetables to street food. 

Although some marketing scholars attempt to define authenticity, the concept remains ambiguous (Bartsch et al., 2022; Nunes et al., 2021). Most conceptualisations acknowledge that authenticity is not a set of discrete properties but an ongoing process of verifying the assumed with the factual or the stated with the actioned (Chiu et al., 2012; Zhang and Patrick, 2021). How this applies to physical spaces, such as street markets, has yet to be explored. Moreover, studies examining authenticity tend to do so from the demand, not the supply side (e.g., Fuchs et al., 2015; Zhang and Patrick, 2021). However, authenticity requires two reference points. As most studies concentrate on changes in individual perceptions (Becker et al., 2019), insights into the economic or societal consequences of authenticity and its curation remain rare (Siemens et al., 2020). The project aims to examine authenticity through a multistakeholder lens, focusing on the supply side (traders’ and market operators’ viewpoints) and economic (customer purchase behaviour) and societal (community well-being) consequences. The final framing of the PhD thesis topic would be however incumbent on the PhD student in cooperation with RBKC and the academic supervisor team. The overall project ownership lies within the successful applicant

What we expect from the candidate?

As a necessary prerequisite to express your interest in this project you shall meet all formal requirements to apply for the doctoral programme at KBS (https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study/postgraduate-research/areas/management-research-mphil-phd) as well as NOT already have been awarded a PhD or equivalent degree. This project is only meant as the thematic context for your PhD research while enrolled in the PhD in marketing programme.

We are looking for a candidate (either home or overseas) with a background in any of the disciplines of marketing, business management, sociology, applied economics, public policy, cultural and urban studies or related fields. They must be interested in exploring the abovementioned topics with us and keen to engage with RBKC’s street trading office on a regular basis. You do not need to be an expert in street market management or trading as this is clearly a PhD in marketing endeavour, though some interest in the intersection of the brick-and-mortar non-store retailing industry and municipal policies is assumed. 

We further expect a reasonable level of personal resilience, readiness to engage with various retailing topics, ability to openly approach people, good oral and written communication skills, as well as a general willingness to embrace new challenges, and diverse cultural settings. We appreciate, a high level of motivation and curiosity in conjunction with the ability to efficiently self-organise. 

Please note the project is available full-time only for a start in September 2025. 

Benefits we offer.

The project provides:

•           a committed contact person at the RBKC street trading office. 

•           access to various RBKC stakeholders depending on the final research design.

•           selected opportunities to get to know the RBKC street trading office/council better through, e.g., a placement or ad hoc project support tasks (please note that while we very much advocate for renumerated engagement, all these options would be time-limited and/or part-time and/or depend on the candidate’s willingness to volunteer as well as subject to availability and, if applicable, individual visa conditions).

•           workspace on our Strand Campus located in Central London. 

•          a edicated interuniversity KBS/Brunel supervisory team with long-standing research experience in marketing, public services management, and small business/family entrepreneurship, and qualitative and quantitative research methods. 

How to apply?

Please submit 1. a letter of motivation (up to 2 pages), and 2. your updated CV incl. your UG and PG degree grades (1 page only) by February 28, 2025, via e-mail to the whole supervisor team:

-Dr Anna Dubiel (Senior Lecturer in Marketing), KBS, anna.dubiel@kcl.ac.uk

-Prof. Dirk vom Lehn (Professor of Organisation and Practice), KBS, dirk.vom_lehn@kcl.ac.uk

-Dr Carolin Decker-Lange (Senior Lecturer in Strategy and Entrepreneurship), Brunel University of London, carolin.decker-lange@brunel.ac.uk

The project team will invite selected applicants for an interview in-person at KBS premises in Central London or if not feasible via MS Teams on March 20 or March 21, 2025. Please kindly note, that we are unable to provide application-related feedback for unsuccessful applicants.

Please do not concurrently – in the context of this project – apply with the KBS PhD programme office. We will ask you to do so if selected. In practice, this means that the applicant selected will need to formally apply with the KBS PhD in Marketing programme with a deadline on June 1, 2025. Being selected for the project does not guarantee admission to the KBS PhD in Marketing programme.


Funding Notes

Funding at the level of home/international student fees (as applicable) and a basic stipend

·      the full KBS home/international tuition fees for three years, the pending submission status fee, and 

·      a tax-free stipend of approximately £21k/annum (2024-2025 rate is £21,237) for four years with small, annual inflationary increases.


References

Bartsch, F., Zeugner-Roth, K. P., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2022). Consumer authenticity seeking: conceptualization, measurement, and contingent effects, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50, 296–323.
Becker, M., Wiegand, N., & Reinartz, W. J. (2019). Does it pay to be real? Understanding authenticity in TV advertising, Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 24-50.
Binkley, J.K., & Connor, J.M. (1998). Grocery market pricing and the new competitive environment. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 273-294. 
Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Kuo, Y.-C. (2012). How to align your brand stories with your products. Journal of Retailing, 88(2), 262-275. 
Dibb, S., Simões, C., & Wensley, R. (2014), Establishing the scope of marketing practice: insights from practitioners, European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 380-404.
Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., & Van Osselaer, S. M. (2015). The handmade effect: What’s love got to do with it? Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 98-110.
Greater London Authority (2019), Street markets toolkit: Evidencing and capturing social value, https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/ulm_toolkit_web.pdf, accessed October 23, 2024
NABMA (2022), National markets survey 2022, https://nabma.com/version2020/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/NABMA-Survey-2022.pdf, accessed November 2, 2024.
Nunes, J. C., Ordanini, A., & Giambastiani, G. (2021). The concept of authenticity: What it means to consumers, Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 1-20.
Office of National Statistics (2021), Economic trends in the retail sector, Great Britain: 1989 to 2021, https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts/balanceofpayments/articles/economictrendsintheretailsectorgreatbritain/1989to2021#online-retail-in-the-uk-analysis-by-sector, accessed November 1, 2024 
RBKC (2022), Kensington and Chelsea markets plan 2022-27, https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/business-and-enterprise/business-advice/markets-and-street-trading-0, accessed November 1, 2024.
Siemens, J. C., Weathers, D., Smith, S., & Fisher, D. (2020). Sizing up without selling out: the role of authenticity in maintaining long-run consumer support for successful underdog brands. Journal of Advertising, 49(1), 78-97.
vom Lehn, D. (2014). Timing Is Money: Managing the Floor in Sales Interaction at Street-Market Stalls, Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13–14), 1448–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.941378.
Zhang, Z., & Patrick, V. M. (2021). Mickey D’s has more street cred than McDonald’s: Consumer brand nickname use signals information authenticity, Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 58-73.
Zukin, S. Reconstructing the authenticity of place. Theory and Society 40, 161–165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-010-9133-1

Peopling Marketing: Interactionist Studies of Marketing Interaction #sssi #emca #sociology #marketing #ethnography #video

Uncategorized

Pre-published version

Peopling Marketing, Organization, and Technology takes an interactionist attitude to study the organization of marketing interaction and the embedding of technology within that organization. By analysing clear illustrative studies, this book explicates the interactionist attitude and demonstrates that production, placing, promotion, and pricing are achieved in, and through, marketing interaction. The studies investigate marketing interaction on street-markets, decision-making about the digitalization of supermarkets, the design of exhibitions and social media to generate memorable experiences, the interactive experiencing of exhibits, and the development of guiding visions in the promotion of Virtual Reality. The analyses reveal the practical and social organization of actions through which marketing and consumption are accomplished. By using different interactionist research methods, they show the contribution research using the interactionist attitude can make to marketing and consumer research, as well as to interactionist sociology concerned with marketing interaction. Aimed at academics, researchers, and students in the fields of marketing and consumer research, as well as in social psychology and sociology, this book will encourage scholars and students in marketing and consumer research to shift their focus from the symbolic to marketing interaction.

Table of Contents (pre-published chapters)

1 Peopling Organisations, Marketing Interaction, and Technology

2 Interactionism and Marketing

3 Marketing Interaction on Street-Markets

4 Digitising Distribution in a Supermarket Chain

5 Designing “Dramatic Experiences” in Museums

6 Editing Museum Experiences: Online Gallery Talks

7 Self-Service Technology and the Exhibition Experience

8 Pricing in Marketing Interaction on Street-Markets

9 Promoting “Virtual Reality” in Public Discourse

10 Discussion: Peopling Marketing, Organization, and Technology

Bibliography

New Paper: “Reframing art online through collective meaning-making” by Linh D. Nguyen, C. Preece, and D. vom Lehn #art #museum #interaction #marketing #sociology #emca #sssi #OA https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2023.2274486

aesthetics, art, Ethnomethodology, experience, interaction, interactionism, museums, publication, sociology, Videoanalysis, visitors

Reframing art online through collective meaning-making

Linh Dan NguyenChloe Preece & Dirk Vom Lehn

“People, Technology and Social Organization. Interactionist Studies of Everyday Life” edited by Dirk vom Lehn, Will Gibson and Natalia Ruiz-Junco (Routledge, 2023) – Table of Contents #emca #interactionism #sssi #sociology

Uncategorized

Google Books Amazon (UK) Amazon (US) Routledge (UK) Routledge (US)

People, Technology and Social Organization

Interactionist Studies of Everyday Life

edited by Dirk vom Lehn, Will Gibson and Natalia Ruiz-Junco

Table of Contents

1 Introduction by Dirk Vom Lehn, Will Gibson, and Natalia Ruiz-Junco

Abstract

The introduction explains the motivation for this book that is a continuation of a long-standing interactionist concern with the empirical exploration of the uses of technologies in people’s everyday lives. The chapter provides a brief overview of the current debates about technology in interactionist sociology. It discusses how technology supports the emergence of and features in, social relationships, how different members of the interactionist “family” – symbolic interactionists, social constructionists, and ethnomethodologists – explore the interweaving of technology with interaction, and how recent technological developments have encouraged studies of online identities, online communities, and online communication as well as the impact of the use of technology on issues such as power and social hierarchies and the formation and negotiations of identity. The chapter ends with a brief summary of the content of the book.

Part 1 Power and Control

2 Being Family and Friends to Abused Women – A Qualitative Study of Digital Media in Intimate Partner Violence by Susanne Boethius and Malin Åkerström

ABSTRACT In research on intimate partner violence, most studies focus on those who are abused. In thischapter, we focus on how families, friends, relatives, and employers of abuse victims interactthrough the use of smartphones, social media platforms, apps, and other internet-connecteddevices. We discuss how digital technology is integrated into the lives of domestic abusevictims and their social networks: friends, relatives, family, and coworkers. Digital technologyhas increased the reach of abuse in close relationships, extending the troubles beyond theborders of the couple immediately involved and providing new ways and opportunities forperpetrators to be present even when physically absent.

3 News, Sex, and the Fight Between Corporate Control and Human Communication Online by Michael Dellwing

Abstract

Centralization, decentralization, hobbyism and monetization have been in perpetual conflict over dominance on the internet for decades. Two domains stand in the center of this fight: news and sex. While sex was long a domain of hobbyist interaction, news was long a domain of centralized, corporate aggregation. Today, subversive use of existing monetized services blur the lines, like decentralized news content on youtube channels as well as nude content on hub sites or onlyfans, which retain decentralization at the expense of introducing monetization. 


These seemingly distant fields are connected: we are witnessing a fight over corporate and centralized control of online spaces, fought with weapons of moral panics. Corporate and state actors show increasing hostility against all forms of decentralized online spaces, using the narrative of “disinformation” to delegitimize and create moral panics over decentralized actors in news and using the narrative of “exploitation” to create moral panics over hobbyist sexual interaction. The former fight has led to demonetization and algorithmic hiding of decentralized news on YouTube; the latter has felled sex- and body-positive online nudity spaces, notably Tumblr in December 2018. In turn, remaining hobbyist corners of online sex spaces show increasing hostility against monetized online sex, which is in large parts infighting between different non-corporate actors, and acts as a diversion from the larger subversive power of online sex. Ground zero for this fight is the r/gonewild subreddit, a mainstay of informal nude self-presentation on reddit. The chapter reconstructs the topography of these conflicts by both reconstructing the moral panics.

4 Terminal Violence: Online Interactions and Infra-Humanization by Simon Gottschalk

Abstract

Combining hypermodern theory and symbolic interactionism, I use vignettes of routine interactions with terminals and with others through terminals to critically examine five of their interrelated features: (1) solicitations overload, (2) the mobilization for instantaneity, urgency, and visibility, (3) digital labor exploitation, (4) ontological disruptions, and (5) silencing. These features require users to adjust their emotional dispositions and mental habits, and those adjustments foster infra-humanization. Whereas infra-humanization is typically explained as an interpersonal process that originates in human agents, the vignettes illustrate that it can also be an intrapersonal experience that originates in non-human ones. In the conclusion, I suggest the need to develop the concept and experience of infra-humanization as a perspective that can help us to critically examine the effects of terminal interaction and resist them.          

5 Summing Up the Criminal Case Online David Wästerfors

Abstract

Online engagement with criminal cases is often interpreted in either punitive or crowdsourcing terms, but interactonist and ethnomethodological analyses can disclose other and more fundamental aspects. This chapter looks closely at a particular practice among posters on the Swedish platform Flashback: that of summing up the discussion ‘so far’. To sum up is a delicate and vulnerable act of rhetoric in this setting, often requested to create order but also criticized for resulting in errors, thereby seen as deflecting rather than reflecting what has been posted previously. By the help of Garfinkel and Sacks’ conceptualization of ‘formulations’ – a common way for conversationalists to comment on and demarcate their actions within an ongoing conversation – the chapter exemplifies the indexical, reflexive and accountable character of online summaries in the Flashback community. Even though summaries can be viewed as a cleansing and ordering device, they might as well expand rather than end the discussion. The author argues that interactions around summaries of crime cases illustrate the online sleuthing culture and how its internal social control as well as meaning production constitute an online setting.

Part 2 Identity and Community

6 Organizing Subcultural Identities on Social Media: Instagram Infrastructures and User Actions by J. Patrick Williams and Samuel Judah

Abstract

This chapter contributes to interactionist scholarship on the intersection of social media and identity through exploring aspects of contemporary subcultural identification on Instagram. Focusing on the straightedge subculture, we pay close attention to users’ productive and consumptive behaviors as embodied in vernacular visual culture. Our particular interest is in how the subcultural and the technological are intertwined in people’s everyday practices. To study this, we focus on the observable vernacular practices through which subcultural identities are made recognizable and intelligible by others through interactions on Instagram. We first describe how Instagram’s infrastructure affords users’ identity expressions, as well as researchers’ analysis of them, through metapictures. We then look at posts as actions that portray subcultural identities visually through photos, narratively through captions, and hypertextually through hashtags. Our focus on action highlights the discursive and constructed nature of subcultural identities.        

7 A Queer Kind of Stigma by Christopher T. Conner and Sarah Ann Sullivan

Abstract

Using a multi-sited multiple methods qualitative research design (including participant observation, in-depth interviews, and analysis of dating profiles) we explore the popular gay dating app “Grindr.” This paper examines how users engage in stigma management techniques in the online world, and how some members reproduce the stigmatization process through their interactions. We also find new forms of stigma that exist within the app through the use of blocking and non-responses—users who were found undesirable preferred being blocked rather than ignored, due to the lack of information provided by those who chose not to respond.  Moreover, while Goffman’s (1963) concept of stigma calls for us to consider how groups manage their stigmatized identities, his analysis of the concept does not explore in-group stigma of those already stigmatized. This paper extends the concepts of homonormativity showing how users reify the concept through a cultural system erected on hierarchies of sexual capital. As other scholars have argued, this process also exemplifies how toxic techno cultures are produced in digital environments through a complex relationship between user interactions and app structure (Massanari 2015). Finally, this paper extends Goffman’s theory of stigma by showing how users make sense of the structural constraints of the app and navigate stigma in the digital world.

8 Symbolic Separation: The Amish and 21st-Century Technologies by Corey J. Colyer, Rachel E. Stein, and Katie E. Corcoran

Abstract

America’s strict Anabaptist communities (such as the Amish) remain a curiosity in the twenty-first century. Their commitments to modesty and technological simplicity mark them counter-cultural, drawing curious onlookers. This chapter considers how members of these strict Anabaptist communities use, reject, and adapt certain technologies to conform with cultural expectations. By regulating technological practice, these communities establish “cultural fences” (Kraybill 2004; Kraybill, Johnson-Weiner, and Nolt 2013). This chapter examines how Amish (and members of other Plain Anabaptist communities) embrace or reject technology. We argue that these dynamics follow the principles of negotiated order (Strauss 1978; Maines 1982). Drawing on Donald Kraybill’s (2001) suggestion that The Amish “negotiate with modernity,” we show how adopting, rejecting, and adapting technology establish symbolic boundaries of Amish identity.

Part 3 Practices and Technology

9 Receiving Phone Calls During Medical Consultations: The Production of Interactional Space for Technology Use by Aleksandr Shirokov, Iuliia Avgustis, and Andrei Korbut

Abstract

Receiving and making calls requires participants to coordinate phone’s use with different ongoing activities. This is especially relevant in institutional settings such as doctor–patient interaction since the participants have a particular task at hand. Upon hearing a call or feeling the mobile phone’s vibration, neither patients nor doctors pick up the phone immediately. They systematically wait for the end of the turn or use various methods depending on the interactional environment to finish their or other’s turn and only then answer the call. In this chapter, we explore how doctors and patients are jointly producing slots for answering the incoming call. Our data consists of 151 video recordings of consultations with various medical professionals collected at a private clinic in Moscow, Russia, in 2018–2019. Data are analyzed using the method of Conversation Analysis. We outline a certain pattern in the way phone calls are handled in medical consultations: doctors tend to initiate the suspension of the conversation with patients and transition to the telephone conversation during their turns.

10 Non-Talking Heads: How Architectures of Digital Copresence Shape Question-Silence-Answer-Sequences in University Teaching by Kenan Hochuli and Johanna Jud

Abstract

This chapter focuses on question-answer sequences in online university teaching. We analyze how lecturers and students organize both individual and interactional conduct after a question has been asked but no answer has been given yet for two different configurations of interaction on digital videoconferencing platforms: One is the “face wall” of Zoom, where participants find themselves in a situation of polyexponation, i.e., a technically increased possibility of mutual perception. The other is Adobe Connect, a platform on which the lecturer communicates auditorily while students use the “chat” function to communicate. The analysis demonstrates how the ways in which participants establish and negotiate copresence within these environments create a different kind of conditional relevance for responding to each other’s contribution. Whereas silent students remain invisible on Adobe Connect, participants on Zoom become noticeable as non-talking heads on the face wall. This chapter’s analysis of short video sequences offers a detailed insight into the unfolding of what has become everyday human interaction in online environments. The data are in German with an English Translation.

11 The Role of Cursor Movements in a Screen-Based Video Game Interaction by Lydia Heiden, Heike Baldauf-Quilliatre, and Matthieu Quignard

Abstract

In a computer-mediated interaction, when participants are not physically co-present, certain resources are no longer available for interaction while others appear, according to the affordances of the technological environment. In this study, we investigate one particular digital tool, the cursor, in the context of a shared interface where cursor movements are visible to one co-participant. We show that the cursor is not only used to “interact” with the digital environment (via clicks) but that cursor movements, which cannot be interpreted by the machine, are oriented towards the co-participants and may have interactional functions. We describe three different kinds of these movements (straight pointing movement, swaying/circling movement and “moving away”) which, depending on who is doing them and in which sequential position they occur, contribute to the sequential organization of the interaction: as a display of attention, as a device for turn-holding/turn-claiming/leaving the floor or as a particular resource in argumentation.

12 Problems with the Digital Public Encounter by Daniela Boehringer

Abstract

The “public encounter” (Goodsell 1981) in the welfare state has massively changed over the past decades. In many cases, it is unnecessary to meet face-to-face with ‘street-level bureaucrats’ (Lipsky 1980) to manage social matters such as unemployment, because self-service applications are ready to hand. How citizens use these applications and how they are “made at home” in the everyday (Sacks 1992) still needs to be uncovered. This question will be considered from a conversation-analytic perspective. The website with job offers run by the German Public Employment Service (PES) is an example in this regard. After describing the website and the features of its use, the paper analyses real-time video data of members searching for a job on that site. The main focus of analysis are the moments of irritation and how the users manage them, are the paper concludes with reflections on the (new?) nature of the digital public encounter.

13 Smartphone Tooling: Achieving Perception by Positioning a Smartphone for Object Scanning by Louise Lüchow, Brian L. Due, and Ann Merrit Rikke Nielsen

Abstract

People have been using tools for thousands of years. These practices of “tooling” have been described as having a “mechanical effect” on an object (e.g., chopping wood). In this chapter we propose that tooling may also have an “informational effect”. To make this argument we explore how visually impaired people (VIP) carry out physical shopping in grocery stores using their smartphones and the SeeingAI application (app). Using a smartphone for scanning means using it as a tool, hence the chapter title “smartphone tooling”. The data consists of a collection of cases in which a VIP is using the smartphone and app to scan products, and the app then provides audible information. The chapter is based on video ethnographic methodology and ethnomethodological multimodal conversation analysis. The chapter contributes to studies of tools and object-centred sequences by showing how VIPs achieve perception of relevant object information in and through a practice we suggest calling “positioning for object scanning”. This is configured by three distinct actions: 1) aligning, 2) adjusting, and 3) inspecting. Studying the practices of VIPs enables us to establish new understandings about the accomplishment of spatial relations between body, object, and technology in situ, without visual perception. This research contributes to EM/CA studies of perception as practical action, visual impairment, and object-centred sequences. 

Part 4 Reflections on Interactionist Studies of Technologies

14 Where Next for Interactionist Studies of Technology? by Dirk Vom Lehn, Will Gibson, and Natalia Ruiz-Junco

Abstract

In the concluding chapter, the editors of the book reflect on the chapters and their contribution to interactionist theory and method, and provide some suggestions for future directions of interactionist research. They highlight that the studies reported in this book continue the traditions of enquiry and critique regarding established views of technology and its relationship

to society. They also point out that the studies make use of novel, often image-based and video-based research methods to explore technology in everyday life. In summary, they argue that interactionism continues to provide a critical set of approaches for the study of technology in everyday life.

New Article: “Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of ‘Communicative Constructivism'” by D. vom Lehn (@dirkvl) and Margarethe Kusenbach #sociology #communicative #constructivism #constructionism #ethnography #video #sssi #emca

Uncategorized

Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of ‘Communicative Constructivism‘”

Dirk vom Lehn , King’s College London

Margarethe Kusenbach, University of South Florida

ABSTRACT

In this article, we offer some observations on the international standing of communicative constructivism (CoCo), as discussed in scholarship published largely in German over the past decade (e.g., KELLER, KOBLAUCH & REICHERTZ, 2013; KNOBLAUCH, 2019a [2016]; REICHERTZ, 2009). We seek to explain why, in our view, CoCo has not thus far had a noticeable influence on academic discourse in international, particularly Anglo-American, sociology. Amongst others, we highlight issues regarding the name that was picked for the perspective and regarding the literal translation of German CoCo terminology into the English language. We also point to some theoretical and methodological choices that have made it difficult to link CoCo to interactionist sociology in general, and to ethnomethodology and ethnography in particular, i.e., perspectives that we are closely aligned with. We conclude with a summary of our observations and a few suggested steps communicative constructivists might consider taking to broaden and diversify the appeal of their program beyond German speaking sociology.

KEYWORDS: 

#communicative #constructivism #constructionism #ethnography #ethnomethodology #focusedethnography #sssi #interactionism #videography

Incomplete List of Books and Papers on ‘Mobility’

Announcement, Anthropology, ethnography, interaction, Mobile, mobility

Mobility – Short List 

Asimakopoulos, Stavros, and Alan Dix. ‘Walking: A Grounded Theory of Social Engagement and Experience’. Interacting with Computers 29, no. 6 (1 November 2017): 824–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwx014.

Becker, Carol. ‘The Art of Crossing the Street’. Art Journal 58, no. 1 (1999): 10–15.

Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada. ‘Delaying Moving Away: Place, Mobility, and the Multimodal Organization of Activities’. Journal of Pragmatics 148 (July 2019): 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.013.

———. ‘Walking Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics47, no. 1 (2013): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016.

Broth, Matthias, and Frederik Lundstrom. ‘A Walk on the Pier. Establishing Relevant Places in a Guided, Introductory Walk’. In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, edited by Pentti Haddington, Maurice Nevile, and Lorenza Mondada. Berlin: DeGryter, 2013.

Brown, Barry, and Eric Laurier. ‘Maps and Car Journeys: An Ethno-Methodological Approach’. Cartographica 4 (2005): 17–33.

Brown, Barry, Eric Laurier, Hayden Lorimer, Owain Jones, Oskar Juhlin, Mark Perry, Daniele Pica, et al. ‘Driving and “ Passengering ”: Notes on the Ordinary Organization of Car Travel’. Mobilities 3, no. 1 (2008): 1–31.

Carlin, Andrew P. ‘Navigating the Walkways: Radical Inquiries and Mental Maps’, n.d.

Cosley, Dan, Jonathan Baxter, Soyoung Lee, Brian Alson, Saeko Nomura, Phil Adams, Chethan Sarabu, and Geri Gay. ‘A Tag in the Hand : Supporting Semantic , Social , and Spatial Navigation in Museums’. Technology, 2009, 1953–62.

De Stefani, Elwys. ‘Rearranging (in) Space: On Mobility and Its Relevance for the Study of Face-to-Face Interaction’. In Space in Language and Linguistics, edited by Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, 434–63. DE GRUYTER, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.434.

De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada. ‘Encounters in Public Space: How Acquainted Versus Unacquainted Persons Establish Social and Spatial Arrangements’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51, no. 3 (3 July 2018): 248–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485230.

Deppermann, Arnulf. ‘Intersubjectivity and Other Grounds for Action-Coordination in an Environment of Restricted Interaction: Coordinating with Oncoming Traffic When Passing an Obstacle’. Language & Communication 65 (March 2019): 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.005.

Deppermann, Arnulf, Eric Laurier, and Lorenza Mondada. ‘Overtaking as an Interactional Achievement: Video Analyses of Participants’ Practices in Traffic’. Gesprächsforschung 19 (2018): 1–131.

Due, Brian, and Simon Lange. ‘Semiotic Resources for Navigation: A Video Ethnographic Study of Blind People’s Uses of the White Cane and a Guide Dog for Navigating in Urban Areas’. Semiotica 2018, no. 222 (25 April 2018): 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0196.

Drury, John, and Elizabeth Stokoe. ‘The Interactional Production and Breach of New Norms in the Time of COVID-19: Achieving Physical Distancing in Public Spaces’. British Journal of Social Psychology 61, no. 3 (2022): 971–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12513.

Foster, Susan Leigh. ‘Walking and Other Choreographic Tactics: Danced Inventions of Theatricality and Performativity’. SubStance 31, no. 2 (2002): 125–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2002.0028.

Goffman, Erving. Behavior in Public Places. Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York and London, 1963.

———. Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Social Order. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

Haddington, Pentti. ‘Leave-Taking as Multiactivity: Coordinating Conversational Closings with Driving in Cars’. Language & Communication 65 (March 2019): 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.003.

Haddington, Pentti, and Tiina Keisanen. ‘Location, Mobility and the Body as Resources in Selecting a Route’. Journal of Pragmatics 41, no. 10 (October 2009): 1938–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.018.

Hall, Tom. ‘Footwork: Moving and Knowing in Local Space(s)’. Qualitative Research 9, no. 5 (1 November 2009): 571–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343626.

Hall, Tom, and Robin James Smith. ‘Stop and Go: A Field Study of Pedestrian Practice, Immobility and Urban Outreach Work’. Mobilities 8, no. 2 (1 May 2013): 272–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.659470.

Hester, Stephen, and David Francis. ‘Analysing Visually Available Mundane Order: A Walk to the Supermarket’. Visual Studies 18, no. 1 (1 April 2003): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860320001000056.

Karamouzas, Ioannis, Brian Skinner, and Stephen J. Guy. ‘Universal Power Law Governing Pedestrian Interactions’. Physical Review Letters 113, no. 23 (2 December 2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.238701.

Laurier, Eric, Magnus Hamann, Saul Albert, and Elizabeth Stokoe. ‘Guest Blog: Walking in the Time of COVID-19’. Research on Language and Social Interaction – Blog (blog), 5 May 2020. https://rolsi.net/2020/05/05/guest-blog-walking-in-the-time-of-covid-19/.

Weilenmann, Alexandra, Daniel Normark, and Eric Laurier. ‘Managing Walking Together: The Challenge of Revolving Doors’. Space and Culture 17, no. 2 (May 2014): 122–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508674.

Laurier, Eric, and Barry Brown. ‘Rotating Maps and Readers: Praxiological Aspects of Alignment and Orientation’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (April 2008): 201–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00300.x.

Lloyd, Michael. ‘Getting by: The Ethnomethods of Everyday Cycling Navigation’. New Zealand Geographer n/a, no. n/a. Accessed 14 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12274.

Marsh, Peter, and Peter Collett. ‘Patterns of Public Behavior: Collision Avoidance on a Pedestrian Crossing’. In Non-Verbal Communication Interaction and Gesture, edited by Adam Kendon, 199–217. The Hague: Mouton, 1981.

Merlino, Sara, and Lorenza Mondada. ‘Crossing the Street: How Pedestrians Interact with Cars’. Language & Communication 65 (March 2019): 131–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.004.

Mondada, Lorenza. ‘Commentary: Being Mobile, Talking on the Move: Conceptual, Analytical and Methodological Challenges of Mobility’. In Space in Language and Linguistics, edited by Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, 464–70. DE GRUYTER, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.464.

———. ‘Talking and Driving: Multiactivity in the Car’. Semiotica 191 (2012): 223–56.

———. ‘Walking and Talking Together: Questions/Answers and Mobile Participation in Guided Visits’. Social Science Information 56, no. 2 (2017): 220–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417694777.

Petri, Jakub. ‘The Forgotten Art of Walking. Toward Intra-Active Geography of an Urban Landscape’. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 14, no. 1 (31 December 2022): 2156437. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2022.2156437.

Ryave, A. L., and J. N. Schenkein. ‘Notes on the Art of Walking’. In Ethnomethodology, edited by Roy Turner, 265–74. Middlesex: Penguin, 1974.

Smith, Robin James, and Tom Hall. ‘Mobilities at Work: Care, Repair, Movement and a Fourfold Typology’. Applied Mobilities 1, no. 2 (2 July 2016): 147–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1246897.

———. ‘Pedestrian Circulations: Urban Ethnography, the Mobilities Paradigm and Outreach Work’. Mobilities 11, no. 4 (7 August 2016): 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211819.

Vergunst, Jo Lee, and Tim Ingold, eds. Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. 1st edition. London New York: Routledge, 2016.

vom Lehn, Dirk. ‘Configuring Standpoints: Aligning Perspectives in Art Exhibitions’. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 96 (2012): 69–90.

———. ‘Withdrawing from Exhibits: The Interactional Organisation of Museum Visits’. In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, edited by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 65–90. March. Berlin: de Gryter, 2013.

Watson, Rod. ‘The Visibility Arrangements of Public Space: Conceptual Resources and Methodological Issues in Analysing Pedestrian Movements’. Communication & Cognition 38, no. 3–4 (2005): 201–27.

Call for Abstracts – Edited Book – “Sensing Life: the social organization of the senses in interaction” #sociology #sssi #emca #interaction #senses

Announcement, book, Call for Papers, Ethnomethodology, sociology, SSSI

Sensing Life: the social organization of the senses in interaction

Co-edited by 

Will Gibson (University College London), Natalia Ruiz-Junco (Auburn University), and Dirk vom Lehn (King’s College London)

This edited collection aims to continue the advances in scholarship of the senses as interactional phenomena and experiences. Our aim is to bring together contemporary empirical research that looks at how the senses are used in interaction, showcasing the broad range of concepts and methodologies through which they can be examined.

In the past decade or so interactionist researchers have been increasingly interested in the role of the senses in social interaction (see e.g., Vannini, Waskul and Gottschalk 2012). A special issue of the journal Symbolic Interaction in 2021 brought together studies that examined sensorial practice, focusing on diverse areas including everyday acts such as cheese and coffee tasting (Mondada, 2021; Fele and Liberman, 2021) through to the professional work of nurses (Grosjean, Matte, and Nahon-Serfaty, 2021) and race car testers (Salvadori and Gobo). These collected papers marked an important development in the empirical examination of communication about the senses, showing how talk, gesture, gaze, material artefacts and other aspects of the physical environment can be mobilised to make the senses accountable to others. The introduction to this special issue (vom Lehn and Gibson, 2021) pointed to several interrelated features of sensorial praxis which the papers helped to bring into focus.  The intersection between different sensorial experiences; the entwinement of the senses with cultural resources and practices; their contextually situated nature and the multimodalstructured but also serendipitous form of expression.

The proposed volume aims to continue these lines of analysis by inviting contributions from a multiplicity of approaches, including symbolic interactionism, ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and cognate areas from Discourse Studies and multimodal inquiry. To balance the strong EMCA theme represented in the 2021 special issue we are particularly keen to encourage papers from symbolic interactionism or that use ethnographic methods.  We are interested in papers that examine conceptually and empirically the uses of the senses in ‘making something happen’, which might be in an institutional or non-institutional context. 

We welcome tentative expressions of interest and are happy to explore the fit of possible research papers with the above theme.

An abstract of no more than 400 words should be submitted by email to Will Gibson, Natalia Ruiz-Junco, and Dirk vom Lehn (SensesInteractionism@gmail.com). Although the deadline has passed on 2 May 2023 we are still accepting abstract submissions.

Bibliography

Fele, Giolo, and Kenneth Liberman. 2021. ‘Some Discovered Practices of Lay Coffee Drinkers’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.486.

Gibson, Will, and Dirk vom Lehn. 2021. ‘Introduction: The Senses in Social Interaction’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 3-9.

Grosjean, Sylvie, Frederik Matte, and Isaac Nahon-Serfaty. 2021. ‘“Sensory Ordering” in Nurses’ Clinical Decision-Making: Making Visible Senses, Sensing, and “Sensory Work” in the Hospital’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.490.

Mondada, Lorenza. 2021. ‘Orchestrating Multi-Sensoriality in Tasting Sessions: Sensing Bodies, Normativity, and Language’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 63–86.

Vannini, Philip, Dennis D. Waskul, and Simon Gottschalk. 2012. The Senses in Self, Society, and Culture. London: Routledge.

Salvadori, Francesca Astrid, and Giampietro Gobo. 2021. ‘Sensing the Bike: Creating a Collaborative Understanding of a Multi-Sensorial Experience in MotoGP Racing’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.529.

Wiggins, Sally, and Leelo Keevallik. 2021. ‘Enacting Gustatory Pleasure on Behalf of Another: The Multimodal Coordination of Infant Tasting Practices’. Symbolic Interaction 44, no. 1: 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.527.

The Anthem Companion to Harold Garfinkel #EMCA #SSSI #Interactionism

Ethnomethodology, Garfinkel, interaction, interactionism

Hopefully, by the end of the year or at the latest by Spring 2023 “The Anthem Companion to Harold Garfinkel” co-edited by Philippe Sormani and myself will be published with Anthem Press. It’s currently due to be published in March 2023.

CONTENTS

List of Illustrations

Introduction                Rediscovering Garfinkel’s ‘Experiments’, Renewing Ethnomethodological Inquiry

by Philippe Sormani and Dirk vom Lehn 

Part I: Exegesis

Chapter One                Garfinkel’s Praxeological ‘Experiments’ 

by Michael Lynch 

Chapter Two               The Continuity of Garfinkel’s Approach:  Seeking Ways of ‘Making the Phenomenon Available Again’ through the Experience and Usefulness of ‘Trouble’ 

by Clemens Eisenmann and Anne Warfield Rawls

Part II: ‘Experiments’

Chapter Three             Lay and Professional Competencies: Linking Garfinkel’s Tutorial Exercises to a Study of Legal Work

by Stacy Lee Burns 

Chapter Four               Bargaining on Street-Markets as ‘Experiment in Miniature’ 

by Dirk vom Lehn 

Chapter Five               Notes on Galileo’s Pendulum

by Dušan I. Bjelić 

Chapter Six                 Disruptures of Normal Appearances in Public Space: the Covid19 Pandemic as a Natural Breaching Situation

by Lorenza Mondada and Hanna Svensson 

Chapter Seven             Gender as a Scientific Experiment: Towards a Queer Ethnomethodology 

by Luca Greco 

Chapter Eight              Breaching and Robot Experiments: Continuing Harold Garfinkel’s Spirit of Experimentation

by Keiichi Yamazaki and Yusuke Arano 

Chapter Nine               Dealing with Daemons: Trust in Autonomous Systems 

by Jonas Ivarsson 

Part III: Implications              

Chapter Ten                Experimenting with the Archive? Performing Purdue in Paris, an Instructive Reprise

by Yaël Kreplak and Philippe Sormani  

Chapter Eleven           Rereading Galileo’s Inclined Plane Demonstration

by Kenneth Liberman, in conversation with Harold Garfinkel  

Postface                      ‘Experiments’ – What Are We Talking About? A Plea for Conceptual Investigations

by Wes Sharrock 

Notes on Contributors

Index of Names

Index of Subjects

Review Essay zur Übersetzung von Harold Garfinkels “Studies in Ethnomethodology” #Soziologie #Ethnomethodologie #Konversationsanalyse #Gesprächsanalyse #emca

Uncategorized

Soeben ist mein Aufsatz/Review Essay zur exzellenten Übersetzung von Harold Garfinkels ‘Studies in Ethnomethodology’ in der Soziologischen Review erschienen.

vom Lehn, D. (2021). Ethnomethodologie: von marginalem Forschungsprogramm zu soziologischem Klassiker. Review Essay zu Harold Garfinkel, ‚Studien zur Ethnomethodologie‘, herausgegeben von Erhard Schüttpelz / Anne Warfield Rawls / Tristan Thielmann, übersetzt von Brigitte Luchesi, Frankfurt/New York: Campus 2020, 386 S., gb., 24,95 € Original: Harold Garfinkel, ‘Studies in Ethnomethodology’, Englewood Cliffs/NJ, Prentice-Hall 1967, 304 S. In Soziologische Revue, vol. 44, no. 4, 2021, pp. 518-531. https://doi.org/10.1515/srsr-2021-0069