Interaction, Organisation & Technology

Exploring the relationship between interaction, organisation and technology

Menu

Skip to content
  • Museums
  • Optometry
  • Markets and Marketing
  • Technology and (Social) Media
  • Methods and Methodology
  • Ethnomethodology and Interactionism
  • Book Reviews
  • Professional Magazines
  • Books

Optometry

Optometry is a form of healthcare practice that provides patients or clients with an assessment of their vision and eye health. Despite being an important field of healthcare in the UK and beyond, it has received little analytic attention in the social sciences. Our research aims to provide a corpus of findings concerning everyday optometric consultations and inform practice and training. In particular our studies are concerned with:

  • the social and interactional organisation of eye examinations and treatment recommendations;
  • the practices through which optometrists assess vision and ocular health in interaction with clients across a range of different settings and circumstances
  • the ways in which various tools and technologies feature in the consultation and the assessment and management of vision and eye health;
  • providing optometrists with insights and findings that can enhance practice and performance.

Approach

We have undertaken a two-year project on ‘The practical work of the Optometrist’ funded by the ESRC. A second project – ‘The practical work of optometrists’ has taken place between 2013 and 2014 to enhance the practical application of these findings. The project involved the video-recording and analysis of over 60 consultations in a range of optometric practices, including ‘high-street’ optician chains, commercial community practices and student clinics. The video recordings were augmented by fieldwork observations and narrative interviews with optometrists. Drawing on relevant insights from ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and workplace studies, the issues addressed by the study include:

  • the practices through which optometrists initiate consultations – in particular how they attempt to elicit and identify any difficulties that clients are experiencing;
  • the contingent deployment of standard tests and procedures, and the ways in which the accomplishment of tests and their ‘reliable’ outcomes emerges through, and is dependent on, interaction;
  • the proper deployment of tools and technologies as establishing situationally appropriate conduct in the examination; and
  • the performance of specialised tasks as reliant on, and embedded, the interaction al organisation of the consultation.

Implications

Our project findings have made a substantial empirical contribution to our understanding of healthcare, professional practice, work and organisation. They have also made a distinctive conceptual and theoretical contribution to social science research and studies of interaction as well as demonstrating the methodologicalrelevance of video-based analyses to in-depth, inductive qualitative analysis that scrutinises the interactional role of vocal and visible phenomena in everyday practice. Our findings offer a range of practical applications and we have enjoyed building up strong working relationships with professional optometrists and optometric organisations. These implications and relationships have been drawn out in a knowledge exchange project ‘The practical work of the optometrist 2’ co-funded by the ESRC and the College of Optometrists. In partnership with the College of Optometrist we have prepared and disseminated a communication skills package and an CET credit-bearing online course on ‘Communication Skills in Optometry’ that currently benefits optometric practitioners, trainers and organisations.

Publications

vom Lehn, Dirk, Peter M. Allen, Helena Webb, Bruce J.W. Evans, Michael Bowen, and Holly Dobrzycki. 2022. ‘Impacting Communication in Optometry: Enhancing Health-Service Experiences’. European Journal of Marketing ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2022-0130. (Open Access until February 2023)

vom Lehn, D., & C. Heath (2021). Embedding Impact in Research Addressing the Interactional Production of Workplace Activities. British Journal of Management, Early View.

Due, Brian L., vom Lehn, Dirk, Webb, Helena, Heath, Christian, and Johan Tærup. 2020. Seeing the Body: Placing Glasses on the Client’s Head at the Optician. Visual Studies, Vol.35(2-3): 109-123.

Gibson, Will, & D. vom Lehn. 2019. Seeing as accountable action: The interactional accomplishment of sensorial work. Current Sociology, Vol.68 (1): 77-96.

vom Lehn, Dirk. 2018. „Probing the art/science binary. Notes on the experimental achievement of shared perception“. In Practicing Art/Science, herausgegeben von Philippe Sormani, Guelfo Carbone, und Priska Gisler, 101–24. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

vom Lehn, Dirk, Helena Webb, Christian Heath, und William Gibson. 2017. „Objective Measures and Subjective Reports. Examining Optometric Practice Video-Based Research in Organizational Settings“. International Review of Qualitative Research10 (2): 128–48.

vom Lehn, Dirk, Helena Webb, Christian Heath, und William Gibson. 2015. „Sehen professionell Sehen. Die interaktive Konstitution visueller Wahrnehmung durch Optiker und ihre Klienten“. In Die Sinnlichkeit des Sozialen. Wahrnehmung und materielle Kultur. Edited by Sophia Prinz und Hanna Katharina Göbel, 399–415. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

vom Lehn, Dirk, Helena Webb, Christian Heath, und Will Gibson. 2013. „Assessing distance vision as interactional achievement: A study of commensuration in action“. Soziale Welt. Vol.64 (1–2): 115–36.

Webb, H., vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., and W. Gibson. (2013). Engendering Response: Professional Gesture and the Assessment of Eyesight in Optometry ConsultationsSymbolic Interaction, 36, 2: 137-158.

Webb, H., Heath, C., vom Lehn, D. and W. Gibson (2013). The Problem With “Problems”: The Case of Openings in Optometry Consultations. Research on Language and Interaction. Vol.46(1), 65-83.

Gibson, Will, Helena Webb, und Dirk vom Lehn. 2011. „Re constituting social praxis an ethnomethodological analysis of video data in optometry consultations“. International Journal of Social Research Methodology14 (3): 207–18. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.563618.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Widgets

Pages

  • About
  • Book Reviews
  • Books
  • Ethnomethodology and Interactionism
  • Markets and Marketing
  • Methods and Methodology
  • Museums
  • Optometry
  • Professional Magazines
  • Publications (chronological)
  • Technology and (Social) Media

Members

  • Dirk vom Lehn

Recent Posts

  • The Anthem Companion to Harold Garfinkel #EMCA #SSSI #Interactionism
  • Introduction to “The Routledge International Handbook of Interactionism” edited by Vom Lehn, Ruiz-Junco, and Gibson (2021) #sssi #emca #sociology
  • Review Essay zur Übersetzung von Harold Garfinkels “Studies in Ethnomethodology” #Soziologie #Ethnomethodologie #Konversationsanalyse #Gesprächsanalyse #emca
  • Book Chapter with Brigitte Biehl (@doktordrama): “Atmospheres as dynamic configurations: The case of a museum and a techno club” #sociology #marketing #emca #museums #technoclub #berghain #StudioBerlin
  • FQS – Debate: “Quality of Qualitative Research” #sociology #sssi #emca

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • June 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • April 2017
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • May 2012
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011

Categories

  • aesthetics
  • analysis
  • Announcement
  • apps
  • art
  • book
  • Book Review
  • Books
  • Call for Papers
  • customer experience
  • customer service
  • dance
  • Deviance
  • dramaturgical
  • ethnography
  • Ethnomethodology
  • exhibitions
  • experience
  • Garfinkel
  • Goffman
  • innovation
  • interaction
  • interaction
  • Interaction
  • interactionism
  • interactivity
  • interactivity
  • internet
  • lifestyle
  • Marketing
  • Marketing
  • markets
  • Media
  • Mobile
  • mobility
  • museums
  • Museums
  • notes on books
  • online reviews
  • optometry
  • Phenomenology
  • Price
  • public places
  • publication
  • quantitative/qualitative
  • research methods
  • Robots
  • Schutz
  • Selfie
  • Senses
  • Social Media
  • social media marketing
  • sociology
  • Special Issue
  • SSSI
  • Syllabus
  • Symbolic Interaction
  • symbolic interactionism
  • taste
  • Teaching
  • Technology
  • Technology
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • Videoanalysis
  • visitors
  • vouchers
  • Museums
  • Optometry
  • Markets and Marketing
  • Technology and (Social) Media
  • Methods and Methodology
  • Ethnomethodology and Interactionism
  • Book Reviews
  • Professional Magazines
  • Books
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Interaction, Organisation & Technology
    • Join 43 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Interaction, Organisation & Technology
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: